In-house agency
You build your own staffing operation — recruiting, credentialing, and deploying clinicians you employ. Maximum control, and a real operational commitment.
Both work. They fail for different reasons, and the choice usually comes down to something no vendor will ask you about: whether you have the internal capacity to govern a program week after week, not just to stand one up.
People use these three terms interchangeably and they are not interchangeable. Getting the vocabulary straight removes most of the confusion.
You build your own staffing operation — recruiting, credentialing, and deploying clinicians you employ. Maximum control, and a real operational commitment.
A vendor manages the whole contingent program for you: suppliers, rates, compliance, and reporting. A service, not software.
The software the program runs on. You can buy it without an MSP and manage the program yourself. Buying the tool and expecting the service is the most common mistake here.
All three defined in the glossary, alongside vendor-neutral and master supplier.
If you go the MSP route, the single question that matters is how vendor neutrality is structurally enforced — not whether it is claimed. Nearly every MSP describes itself as neutral. Far fewer can explain the mechanism that stops their own clinicians getting first look at your requisitions.
We are an agency that also runs MSP programs, which means you should ask us this harder than you ask anyone. Our answer is in the scorecard, including the parts where we score ourselves imperfectly.
The questions that come up once the models are understood.
Supplier count, how rates are set, and who owns it internally. We will tell you honestly which model fits — including when the answer is that you do not need an MSP.